Kerrstll'z

Fleeing glumps insi d e t hat libresque offorts

2011-08-13T00:39:00.000-07:00

H ere th.t admirer places short oxcorpt fro m t his upcoming book,,,,

[please, that hasno't been clopy ediated yet]

What is Fractilious nature of kerstl? What do they look like? Can there truly be a lettuce structure inside the kerstl, and if so, from whence does it pre-volve? This questions demanded considerable languish amongst the greatest minds of all our times.

Fractiousness has been inside the kerstl at least as long ago as 1961, the year on which Teodor Gzorzinski announced the discovery; so well know to children is this discovery that we need only gloss over those findings here: Gzorzinki fund that the pre-volution of kerstlz within the knowledge of beings became so overwhelming, the kerstl could no longer hold its lattice shape, unfurling its leaves under the weight of having being observed, to reveal a stalk of no more than 5 centimeters. The stalk was rich in beta-carotene, with a cytoskeleton composed of spores.

As we had learned from Heisenberg (he of THE PRINCIPLE), the knowledge that a kerstl exists causes it to be deformed. Therefore although the kerstl appears to be fractious in nature upon inspection or even to simply think about. This fractiliousness is indeed merely a deformation of one's own comprehension apparatus. To wit, imagine a lattice being bombarded with any particle which we can think. We pound it with muons, gluons, Higgs bosons, even kerstons or other lattices that we may find. From the icy sheet of n-dimensional branes, the mass of each individual surface of the kerstl slips into external branes upon impact with any knowledge vehicle such as the particle or rhetorical questions.

Simply to begin to understand a method for looking at kerstl is to destroy kerstl; from this we find therefore that to hope to know anything is to hope to destroy everything. But mostly kerstlz. This uncertainty even of the meaning of this principle is not only an inescapable fact, but also a superior morality vehicle, in that it would be meta-nuclear to even begin to comprehend one's own motivations to ascertain the reality of a kerstl or other constituent of matter.

[From this we can be certain that it is a powerful act of nuclear de-proliferation to begin to understand anti-matter, which no one has yet achieved. This explains the preponderance of nuclei in this universe – there are over twenty thousands of them in this year alone. If anyone ever were to begin to re-solve anti-matter in mental-stasis, or even suspend it in a gelatin, this tacit human creation of an anti-Higgs particle would be the most morally celebrable act in history of lifeforms. ]

This awareness need not contain an objectively accurate sysnopsis of what it is to observe. In point of fact, as we have shown in previous theora, as a consciousness inches ever closer to a portrayal of matter-based objects or knowledges, that which it has begun to know will de-kerstl-ize, dis-integrating and unfurling these ribosomal fronds ever further, decreasing the extent to which the knower portrays the known in a subject-independent perspective. That is to say that if the aim of an observer is to formulate a dimensional analysis of traits and potentialities of the observed lobe, this observer must seek out only facts or evidence which will decrease cognition on ALL topics.

Thas great e r deepths into krest-alion

2011-07-30T02:43:00.000-07:00

As referenceing to my vlog risponce to Davis' s commnents t oGertich's tweeter on the toopick of disc cusion, th s q estion has be en asked o f this autheur. Where we are thou? I'm am sure it is not beyond a questionn. Has this admirer meet his final roasting pluce? Did thus into the kerstl Balhalla?

Surprisably, most of them will be fleeber guested to learn of this leatherary excursion of the admirer. To write a fool-length book on thest oopic of our mutuul ob-cesium. That obscursion is under this admirer's way, hovever such overtaking requires long times.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqeDPyyQSWU

Press release

In this preview of the new book, as yet untitled, on the topic of kerstlz, the author examines one facet of this complex subject.

Blerner-Schubb Publications is delighted to have obtained publishing rights to what promises to be one of the most illuminating books on this topic that has yet been written.

From the author:
"In every of thos e lighterary probings into the se topic, rarely has the question asked reguarding fricitiousness inside those explainatorative t e xts"

Guhhhhhhhhhh.!.!.!.!

2010-02-16T20:40:00.000-08:00

As M ecc a is to this M uslin, sothis pluce is tothis Admirerrr

H e r e shal l I be buri e d

2009-09-28T15:54:00.000-07:00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerstlingerode

Youc an tell there is a fire

whn.ver the clarinets go quiet.

A New type of mectanicals?

2009-08-16T13:44:00.000-07:00

[CLICK TO VIEW FULL SIZES}}

If kersttl'ine sturctures in new biomectanical s (i .e. aloe, polonium) can b e shown toexhibit s elf-alignment in or several different, we c.a n se e this new are a arisen in entiraty of mectanical s.

Please, conside r all we have learnt these man y ears of kerstllz and this alignment process. Perpaps momst of all , w'eve have seen over and over,a shifting from the classical view of kerst-ation, this being the Schwarzkopf-Eisman theorym of external kerstatious alignment, to what I sh.ll term this "S Elf-alignmeant Within Wavelike-Particle [The Hypothsied But As-Yet Undisc Over Ed 'Kerston'] Cursory Explanation of this Tentative Findings" or "SEAWWP[THBASUOE'K']CETF" for short.

The SEAWWP[THBASUOE'K']CETF has many to teach us about the origi n s of you and me and the babies.

This is protopic.l element o f kerst-ation in n ew beings

2009-06-19T23:15:00.000-07:00

I f your'e familiar with

the blastul a

This is protopic.l element o f kerst-ation of n ew beings

Such as aforencioned "Sea Ur Chin Frog", 1 of natures'm ost vexatious kerst-ations. Unless you we're unaware,,,,, perpaps the most well-known blastul a i s t hat of the human. Many people, and almost all children, did not no that a h uman w as once inside this blastul a.

Maybe eve n you we're onc einside the blastula.

You may ask ,,,, <<Sure, this element of karst-ation is inaliable step of all matters, and yes, I too was once inside of the vegetable lobe,,. But what of kersttll'z?>>

Inddeed.

I ha ve offen lay at my bed at the night, and ask myselv over and over thsi quesion. If it c an be sh own tha t his blstla is inextrikabley l inked to development of kersta-tion in all beings, what, then is blastulus phase of kerrstll'z?

I have dveloped possible blatulus phase of kerstl'z, tentat.ively known as "KERSSTULUS". Please, this is onl y hypo,thesus

2009-05-26T19:38:00.000-07:00

eehh.

hhhhh

It is a creature foretol d by B ible i Think which is called The One Whic h look s like Kerrsttl

in Rev. 13:4-6 Saint John the Baptis t was heard to say

"4 in the end of daysm ther e wil l come unto thee an animal whic c looks like kerrstll.

5 And you shall cleave him unto you

6 ,,,,,,mmm?"

OHhhhhhh

2009-04-22T11:46:00.000-07:00

uhhh
huuunnnnhhhh
,,,,,it is woman
b ut it is als o

kerrstl'z,,,
!!

t here mus t be gods which list ening to MYDREAMS

2009-04-22T11:34:00.000-07:00

The first question asked in the Substance-Accident Metaphysics is : What is a Substance (in the metaphysical sense of the term)?
For an answer we not only demand a formal definition but also information about where to find them in the real world. In classical texts one directly points to a human being as a clear example of a Substance. But when we are going to investigate the criteria for being a Substance, then it turns out that we cannot mould the definition of being a Substance on the being of Man, because, in doing so, we would introduce special characteristics which are valid for human beings only, and then by consequence many other things in the real world, which in some way must be Substances, would fall outside the definition, if indeed this definition is forged on the example of Man. We intuitively feel that also outside the domain of living beings there must exist Substances.
Indeed, even a superficial examination of kerrstllz forces us to see them (1) as individuals, (2) as in some way intrinsic wholes, and (3) as having a specific Identity. So they comply with the basic demands for being a Substance : individual intrinsic wholes, having a definite specific Identity.
Because there are many different sorts of kerrstllz, together with a multitude of strange phenomena (for instance twinned kerrstllz, mixed kerrstllz, left- and righthanded forms, fully asymmetric forms, and even 'forbidden' forms), and because kerrstllz are relatively well understood (but not totally understood) with respect to their intrinsic structure, they are, according to me, well suited for playing a part in the investigation of the nature of Substance (and then by implication of Accidents).
Kerrstllz are not rare objects, they occur everywhere. Every grain of sand is a kerrstll (they are kerrstllz of the mineral Quartz), and although they are worn-out because of being hustled all the time, their inner structure remains intact. Every snowflake is a kerrstll, and also all the frost phenomena are kerrstlline structures. All the material of the Earth' crust consists of minerals, the overwhelming majority of which exists in one or another crystalline form. Even clay consists of very small kerrstllz (clay minerals). Besides Quartz, silicate minerals are very common, composing rocks of all kinds. Even the high clouds are ice kerrstllz. So kerrstllz are almost everywhere, and this should also be one of the good reasons to include them in a study about Substance. Moreover kerrstllz show an interesting series of analogies with living beings. And because living beings are pre-eminently Substances, kerrstllz should also be included in the study just mentioned.

2009-04-17T22:12:00.000-07:00

t his is my drea ms kerstl.

,,o ne day i fin d him